Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)

Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)

Overview

What is Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)?

Zipwhip, a texting-for-businesses application for two-way text between a company and its customers, was acquired by Twilio, and discontinued.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Did not think...

3 out of 10
October 28, 2022
I use Zipwhip when a member needs to book a class or cancel a class as well as a prospect who wants information about my company The …
Continue reading

Texting Platform

8 out of 10
February 22, 2022
Incentivized
We use Zipwhip to correspond with our Season Ticket Members and new prospects. Our Fan Services Reps will reach out to their clients to …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Starter

$19.00

Cloud
per month

Unlimited

$49.00

Cloud
per month

Premium

$99.00

Cloud
per month

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)?

Zipwhip, was a texting-for-businesses application for two-way text between a company and its customers. It was acquired by Twilio in 2021 and is now EOL, and no longer available for sale.

Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued) Video

Zipwhip invented Texting for Business. Since 2014 when we first enabled texting to and from existing landline, VoIP and toll-free phone numbers, Zipwhip has empowered more than 30,000 businesses to communicate with their customers in the most effective way possible. With Zipw...
 Show More

Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued) Competitors

Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued) Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Zipwhip, a texting-for-businesses application for two-way text between a company and its customers, was acquired by Twilio, and discontinued.

TextUs and Heymarket are common alternatives for Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued).

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 1.4.

The most common users of Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued) are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(21)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
February 22, 2022

Texting Platform

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Zipwhip to correspond with our Season Ticket Members and new prospects. Our Fan Services Reps will reach out to their clients to deliver information through that platform. Most frequently, we use it for information that can be delivered quickly and is generally pretty brief. We’ll use email or phone for more in-depth info.
  • Plugs into Salesforce
  • Allows you to use current phone number
  • Easy correspondence with clients
  • Platform is being sold and is going away
  • No opportunity to continue with platform after this year
  • Mass texting
Zipwhip is well suited for brief communication at scale. Our Fan services reps after close to 1,000 accounts, and this allows them to get out quick messages at scale. It is less appropriate for longer messages where email or a phone call is the better route to reach out.
  • Plug into Salesforce
  • Texting
  • Using your phone number
  • More touchpoints to clients
  • Clients are happier
  • Our retention has gotten better
Zipwhip is just a little bit more user-friendly than AliveChat because it allows you to text people on more scale. AliveChat has a great website chat function, but its texting platform is a little more clunky than Zipwhip. Zipwhip is a little more expensive but definitely the better product.
Mike Monteiro | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently only use Zipwhip within two departments. One that uses it to outbound text customers once they sign up for a tour automatically, which is a nice feature and one for inbound texts to a toll-free number. The department that uses it for automatic texting also uses it for conversations with their college-age customers who prefer that method of communication.
  • API to allow triggered text messaging.
  • Tied to a direct phone number that people can also call.
  • Easy to track a conversation in a thread.
  • Very painful customer service and account management. We originally used this throughout the whole organization, but due to issues with their account management and service, we moved most away from it.
  • Overpriced for what it offers when other services offer both text and voice for a lower cost
  • Mobile app and desktop app did not always received texts in real time.
I really dislike Zipwhip, especially now that there are so many more options out there. If you are still using a landline or a desk phone, but need the ability to receive/send text messages from your phone number, this would work well for you still. Besides that, I can't see many reasons to use this product anymore. Things like EZtexting offer these same functions and more. Or even better, Dialpad offers the voice and text options for one price.
  • They out of the blue raised the price 300% on us that negatively impacted the budget we had planned out for the year.
  • Initially it did help increase contact rates.
  • Time consuming and hard to manage.
We mainly use EZ Texting to bulk text when needed and we use Dialpad for our 1 on 1 communications via text now. Our voice is through Dialpad so it is a lot more efficient for agents to be in one place for all manners of communication. EZ Texting allows us to bulk text where Zipwhip did not allow us to do that
It always took many emails to get an issue resolved, no matter how complex or easy the issue was. Wasted a lot of time on things that didn't need time wasted on. The account management piece could never keep our accounts straight and we frequently had to request they update something each month.
It was very easy for users to use, straight forward, and user friendly. The desktop app is very basic but easy to reply to an incoming text, but the user had to know to allow Chrome notifications to see new incoming text via the web browser, which is how they mainly used it.
Return to navigation